Contact
Reach out to Brealant about the granted patent you want to challenge, or the revocation action you need to defend.
Search
We review the patent, cited prior art, and the surrounding technical field.
Quote
Receive a staged service quote covering each phase of the revocation matter.
Pay
Proceed with secure payment for the stage you're instructing us on.
File
Brealant files the revocation application, or the defence, with IPOS or the Court, as relevant.
Wait
Await the tribunal's process through pleadings and evidence; timing varies by case.
Response
Receive the outcome — a hearing date, decision on the papers, or negotiated resolution.

In Singapore, a revocation matter can proceed before IPOS (typically for more straightforward matters) or before the Court (often used where infringement is also in issue). Both paths involve setting out the grounds relied on, followed by evidence, before a decision. Choosing the right forum is one of the first strategic decisions Brealant helps you make.
Patent revocation matters are technical and can be costly if fully contested, so it's important to weigh the strength of the grounds and the commercial impact of the granted patent before committing. Brealant provides a merits assessment before recommending action.
Revocation is powerful, but it has real limits
No Retrospective Undoing
Revocation removes the patent going forward on decision; it doesn't automatically undo past licensing or settlement arrangements.
Cost and Time
A fully contested revocation, particularly before the Court, commonly runs well over a year and involves significant professional costs.
Burden of Proof
The party seeking revocation must prove its grounds with technical evidence — a weakly evidenced challenge is unlikely to succeed.
Partial Outcomes
Revocation may result in the patent being maintained in amended, narrower form rather than being wholly revoked.
Choice of Forum Matters
Choosing IPOS or the Court affects procedure, cost, and timing — the wrong choice can add delay.
Brealant gives you a realistic view of the likely outcome, timeline, and cost before you proceed.
A well-run revocation matter protects a range of interests
Freedom to Operate
Removing overly broad or invalid claims that could restrict your own product or process.
Fair Competition
Ensuring only patents that genuinely meet the legal requirements remain on the register.
Technology Field Integrity
Keeping the patent register reflective of genuinely novel, inventive contributions.
Your Commercial Plans
Protecting product launches or investments that could otherwise be blocked by an invalid grant.
Brealant helps you weigh these interests against the cost and time of a contested revocation before you commit.

Revocation follows a structured process, whichever forum is used
Filing the Application
The revocation application, setting out the grounds relied on, is filed with IPOS or the Court.
Defence/Counter-Statement
The patent owner files a defence responding to the grounds raised.
Evidence Stages
Both sides file technical evidence, often including expert reports, in sequence.
Hearing and Decision
The matter is decided on the papers or, more commonly, after a hearing.
Given the technical evidence typically involved, a contested patent revocation in Singapore commonly runs well over a year from filing to a final decision.
Costs scale with the forum chosen and how far the matter proceeds
IPOS or Court fees apply at filing and subsequent procedural stages, and vary by forum.
IPOS or Court fees apply at filing and subsequent procedural stages, and vary by forum.
Brealant scopes and quotes each stage separately, as the matter develops.
Singapore's Positive Grant System removed the pre-grant opposition stage; instead, third parties who consider a granted patent invalid can apply to revoke it before IPOS or the Court.
Any interested person can apply — commonly a competitor concerned about the scope of claims that have already been granted.
Common grounds include lack of novelty, lack of inventive step, insufficient disclosure, added matter, and wrongful entitlement to the patent.
It depends on the matter — IPOS is often used for more straightforward validity challenges, while the Court is common where infringement is also being litigated. Brealant advises on the best forum for your situation.
The patent may be revoked entirely, or maintained in amended, narrower form, depending on the grounds upheld.
Yes, a patent granted under the supplementary examination route can still be revoked on the same statutory grounds as one granted after full examination.
You'll need a statement of grounds identifying the prior art or other basis relied on, filed with IPOS or the Court together with the prescribed form and fee.
Yes, parties can reach a settlement — for example, through claim amendment or a licence arrangement — before the matter proceeds to a full hearing.
Costs depend on the technical complexity and how contested the case becomes; Brealant provides a clear quote once we understand the grounds involved.
Yes, either party can appeal an IPOS or Court revocation decision through the applicable Singapore appellate process.
Discover more insights and stay informed about the latest in intellectual property with Brealant's blog. From expert advice on trademark registration and patent protection to strategies for safeguarding your brand in a competitive market, our resources are here to empower your business.
Explore our blog to learn how effective IP management can strengthen your brand's position and protect your innovations
Get expert guidance on your trademark, patent, copyright or design filing. Book a free 15-minute call with an IP specialist — no obligation.
Book My Free Call