Resolving Formalities Objections

Most commonly, incomplete or non-compliant representations, incorrect Locarno classification, or missing priority documentation.

In many cases yes, provided the amendment doesn't add new matter beyond what was originally disclosed.

The application, or the specific design affected within a multiple application, may be deemed not filed.

Yes, we can take over an existing EU design application at any stage before registration.

No, there is no additional EUIPO fee to respond — only Brealant's professional fee applies.

EUIPO typically sets a two-month deadline to correct deficiencies, though this can sometimes be extended on request.

No, provided the correction doesn't introduce new matter beyond what was originally shown — permitted amendments keep your original filing date intact.

A design office action is almost always about formalities — representations, classification, or documentation — since EUIPO doesn't examine designs for novelty, whereas trademark office actions usually raise substantive objections like descriptiveness.

Yes, a deficiency can be specific to one design within a multiple application, leaving the others to proceed toward registration on their original timeline.

If certified priority documents aren't filed within the required period, EUIPO can refuse to recognise the priority claim, though the underlying application can still proceed without it.