Language
Every Chilean design application undergoes a genuine substantive examination for novelty and original character before INAPI will grant it — a more rigorous check than the formalities-only review used in many other countries. Our team at Brealant prepares applications built to withstand that scrutiny.
.png)
Legal Definition of Design Examination
Examination under Ley N° 19.039 is the substantive review INAPI conducts on every design application, testing whether the design is genuinely new and possesses its own original character.
Purpose and Function of Examination
Unlike jurisdictions that register designs on formalities alone, INAPI's examiners search prior disclosures and compare overall appearance before any Chilean design is granted.
Protecting Your Application
Well-prepared representations and a considered description reduce the risk of an adverse examination finding, and make any objection that does arise easier to overcome.
.svg)
Contact
Discuss your design and enforcement plans with Brealant before, or shortly after, filing.
.svg)
Search
We review the design's novelty position against the prior art landscape.
.svg)
Quote
Receive a service quote for managing the application through examination.
.svg)
Pay
Proceed with secure payment for the selected services.
File
We ensure the representations and description are positioned to withstand substantive review.
.svg)
Wait
INAPI's examiner searches for prior designs and assesses newness and original character.
.svg)
Response
You receive the examination outcome — approval for publication, or a report requiring a response.
.png)
In Chile, every design application is substantively tested against prior disclosures — there's no separate 'formalities only' registration option. Understanding what the examiner is likely to search, and preparing representations accordingly, is the clearest way through this stage without delay.
Because a Chilean design can be refused outright at the substantive examination stage if it isn't found new and original, getting the application strategy right before filing — not just at the point of an objection — is essential. Brealant builds applications with this scrutiny in mind from the start.
Careful preparation helps considerably, but it has limits
No Guaranteed Outcome
Even a well-prepared application can be refused if the examiner identifies genuinely close prior art.
Examiner's Own Search
INAPI's examiner conducts an independent search, which may surface references beyond what a private search identifies.
Response Deadlines Still Apply
If an objection is raised, a substantive, timely response is still required.
Doesn't Prevent Third-Party Opposition
Passing examination doesn't prevent a third party opposing after publication, within the statutory window.
New Matter Restrictions
Amendments made in response to an objection generally can't add matter beyond what was originally disclosed.
Brealant gives you a realistic assessment of the novelty position before and throughout examination.
Preparing properly for substantive examination protects
Your Filing Date
A well-prepared application reduces the need for amendments that could complicate your original filing date.
Your Scope of Protection
Representations drafted with examination in mind help avoid unnecessary narrowing later.
Your Timeline
Fewer objections generally means a faster path to publication and grant.
Your Investment
Protecting the time and cost already spent developing and documenting the design.
Brealant's attorneys assess the novelty position carefully before and during examination.
Substantive examination typically follows these stages
.svg)
Filing
The application is lodged with representations and a descriptive memorandum.
.svg)
Formal Review
INAPI checks the application meets formal requirements before substantive examination begins.
.svg)
Substantive Search & Assessment
The examiner searches prior disclosures and assesses novelty and original character.
.svg)
Outcome
The examiner approves the application for publication, or issues observations requiring a response.
Substantive examination is typically the longest phase of the Chilean design process, commonly taking several months depending on INAPI's caseload and whether observations are raised.
Examination is a built-in part of every Chilean design application, so costs are largely covered by the standard filing process
.svg)
Substantive examination is conducted as part of the standard official filing and grant fees — there's no separate government fee to request it, as there can be in other jurisdictions.
.svg)
Brealant's professional fee for managing the application through examination, including any response to observations, is quoted based on complexity.
Brealant gives you a realistic assessment of the novelty position before and throughout examination.
Once your design clears substantive examination and is published, Brealant continues to track the matter through the opposition period to final grant, and supports enforcement immediately afterwards, since a granted Chilean design is enforceable from registration.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.svg)
.svg)
Yes — unlike some jurisdictions where examination must be separately requested, INAPI substantively examines every design application for novelty and original character as a standard part of the process.
The examiner searches the INAPI register and other publicly available design disclosures, comparing overall appearance against your application.
You'll have an opportunity to respond or amend within a set deadline before INAPI decides whether to proceed toward publication or refuse the application.
Not entirely — publication still opens a statutory window for third-party opposition, though a design that has cleared substantive examination is generally in a stronger position.
Substantive examination is typically the longest stage of the process, commonly taking several months, depending on INAPI's workload and whether observations are issued.
Yes, responses to INAPI's examination findings must be filed through an authorised local representative, which Brealant provides.
No separate INAPI fee applies to respond within the deadline — only Brealant's professional fee for preparing the arguments.
Yes, if you've disclosed a similar design of your own before the relevant date, the examiner can treat it as prior art, subject to limited grace-period exceptions.
Examiners search the INAPI register and reasonably accessible public disclosures worldwide, including foreign design registers, product catalogues, and online sources.
You can file arguments and, where appropriate, amended representations within the response deadline, and ultimately appeal an adverse decision to the Tribunal de Propiedad Industrial (TDPI).
Discover more insights and stay informed about the latest in intellectual property with Brealant's blog. From expert advice on trademark registration and patent protection to strategies for safeguarding your brand in a competitive market, our resources are here to empower your business. .
Explore our blog to learn how effective IP management can strengthen your brand's position and protect your innovations
.svg)
.svg){kind=icon}
Get expert guidance on your trademark, patent, copyright or design filing. Book a free 15-minute call with an IP specialist — no obligation.
Book My Free Call.avif)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
%2520(1).jpeg)
